:: Hotel du Department, Patrick Blanc - image via CNN
With references to Patrick Blanc and Ken Yeang, as well as some of the new architectural imagery that features more verdant surfaces, the article outlines some of the benefits: "Designers claim that plants not only provide a beautiful alternative to other materials used in construction, they also offer additional benefits, including noise reduction, natural cooling, air conditioning and a psychological boost to those who use the buildings."
The article also quotes from Richard Sabin, from UK firm, Biotecture (nice!) which specializes in the installation of a range of living walls. Definitely check out their system, and the conceptual framework of their term BioTecture: "Biotecture is an abbreviation of “Biological Architecture”, so far used by a small number of alternative builders. We believe that the concept of green walling and “biomembranes” is ready - and required - within the commercial realm as architects, developers and town planners seek to find more sustainable methods of creating buildings with lower or zero carbon footprints."
As mentioned, there are some nameless references to some drawbacks: "Critics argue that the thirsty nature of living walls detracts from their environmental credentials and they require more maintenance than conventional materials" Really, plants do need water and maintenance, because they are a living thing, but the also have a ton of benefits as seen above beyond any other type of skin materials. I'd be curious who this criticism is coming from and what the motivation is?
And again, CNN - if you use the term, give us some props...!
2 comments: