The Dirt blog featured the latest editorial 'Land Matters' from Bill Thompson at Landscape Architecture Magazine -
'In Search of a Good, Cheap Green Roof'. While pointing out some stunning examples such as the California Academy of Sciences Green Roof and the one atop Chicago City Hall as a bit pricey (and forgetting the equally spendy ASLA HQ Green Roof) - the dialogue goes more towards the widescale benefits of having these things on 1000s of buildings.
:: Cal Academy Roof - image via The DirtBill asked a great
question about mass-adoption, and our role as Landscape Architects in this process:
"How can we progress beyond a few high-profile green roofs sprinkled here and there in a few of our cities? Scale is what will make green roofs work as an ecosystem service. If they are really to ameliorate stormwater runoff and the heat island effect, we need whole city blocks that are green roofed corner to corner. We need lots of multiacre green roofs on big-box stores on the urban fringe. What will it take for these to happen? A few local governments are offering incentives for buildings with roofs that soak up rain and keep it from overloading the city sewer system. That’s part of the solution. We also need low-cost, foolproof systems put in by experienced installers who know green roofs because that is the core of their business. But if green roofs become a streamlined, mass-production enterprise dedicated to greening America’s rooftops, will designers then have a role?
Landscape architects who continue to have a role in the future will be those who have proved they are up to the job. With green roofs, a lot seems to fall through the cracks between the drawing board and the final product. Landscape architects who get serious about this project type will have to learn about the technology, test their products, and pay attention to what happens on the job site—and afterward. Do green roofs present enough of an opportunity for landscape architects to make that kind of learning curve worth the time and effort?"
The question is a good one. For starters, I think we already have - with
recent numbers of green roofs installing in North America being a great indication that there are affordable examples available in many cities. These wouldn't be happening at this rate (even with laws and incentives) if they weren't being done at a reasonable cost.
Our role, however, is something I believe many of us have grappled with often thinking about the market for landscape architecture services in green roof design. The goals of projects has a wide range along a continuum from purely functional to the signature roofs mentioned above and many variation in between. While mass production of rooftop greening may exclude LA's from the low-end of the spectrum due to cost, there's plenty of other projects that require our services.
Or as I've found out from experience, the role of the LA in this case isn't as much to create a signature rooftop 'design' but to put on our technical problem solving hat and look at inventive ways to produce a quality, affordable design at a low cost. This includes elimination of system components when possible, or presenting clients with options that meet their needs without adding unnecessary elements. The amount of money spent on our fees in this case will directly result in cost savings - for instance, if an LA get's $2-3 per square foot for design fees, and in turn knocks $4-5/sf off the cost of the green roof project - it's a win-win for everyone. And it's possible and has happened many times over. And they can still look stunning - it's a not a compromise of design - it's about design.
Perhaps we need to collectively market this idea of our unique problem solving skills and their cost-benefit to projects, rather than just focus our praise and caution on the award-winning exemplars of the genre. It's often about the money, and there is a perceived value of our 'high design' services for the high-profile roofs, but not our 'functional design' services to save a client money.
I'm interested to see this dialogue unfold online and in the pages of LAM, and as always thank Bill for being an apt and current provocateur.